[PATCHv9 01/43] clk: Add support for regmap register read/write
Tero Kristo
t-kristo at ti.com
Thu Oct 31 10:40:21 EDT 2013
On 10/31/2013 04:03 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 10/25/2013 10:56 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> [...]
>> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
>> index 7e59253..63ff78c 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
>
> [...]
>> -static inline u32 clk_readl(u32 __iomem *reg)
>> +static inline u32 clk_readl(u32 __iomem *reg, struct regmap *regmap)
>> {
>> - return readl(reg);
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + if (regmap)
>> + regmap_read(regmap, (u32)reg, &val);
>> + else
>> + val = readl(reg);
>> + return val;
>> }
>>
>> -static inline void clk_writel(u32 val, u32 __iomem *reg)
>> +static inline void clk_writel(u32 val, u32 __iomem *reg, struct regmap *regmap)
>> {
>> - writel(val, reg);
>> + if (regmap)
>> + regmap_write(regmap, (u32)reg, val);
>> + else
>> + writel(val, reg);
>> }
>>
>> #endif /* CONFIG_COMMON_CLK */
>>
>
> Might it not be better to introduce regmap variants?
> static inline void clk_regmap_writel(u32 val, u32 reg, struct regmap
> *regmap)
> and corresponding readl? that allows cleaner readability for clk
> drivers that use regmap and those that dont.
Well, doing that will introduce a lot of redundant code, as the checks
for the presence of regmap must be copied all over the place. With this
patch, all the generic clock drivers support internally both regmap or
non-regmap register accesses.
> regmap can also return error value that could also be handled as a result.
True, however if the regmap fails for the clock code, not sure what we
can do but panic. If this code is expanded, it is probably better to not
inline it anymore.
-Tero
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list