[PATCH 00/19] Enable various Renesas drivers on all ARM platforms
Artem Bityutskiy
dedekind1 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 29 09:06:20 EDT 2013
On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 10:12 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Laurent
>
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patch series, based on v3.12-rc7, prepares various Renesas drivers
> > for migration to multiplatform kernels by enabling their compilation or
> > otherwise fixing them on all ARM platforms. The patches are pretty
> > straightforward and are described in their commit message.
> >
> > I'd like to get all these patches merged in v3.14. As they will need to go
> > through their respective subsystems' trees, I would appreciate if all
> > maintainers involved could notify me when they merge patches from this series
> > in their tree to help me tracking the merge status. I don't plan to send pull
> > requests individually for these patches, and I will repost patches
> > individually if changes are requested during review.
> >
> > If you believe the issue should be solved in a different way (for instance by
> > removing the architecture dependency completely) please reply to the cover
> > letter to let other maintainers chime in.
>
> Exactly this was my doubt. If we let these drivers build on all ARM
> platforms... Maybe we should just let them build everywhere? Unless there
> are real ARM dependencies. Maybe you could try to remove the restriction
> and try to build them all on x86?
If they have never been used on anything but ARM, why would you remove
ARM dependencies? Just for the sake of compile-checking?
Also, if ARM dependency is ever removed, all these should become 'n' by
default in the Kconfig, in order to make sure they do not slip into
defconfigs of different architectures.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list