[PATCHv2 1/3] Input: twl4030-keypad - add device tree support
Kumar Gala
galak at codeaurora.org
Tue Oct 29 04:33:31 EDT 2013
On Oct 28, 2013, at 8:06 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:42:47AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> +This binding is based on the matrix-keymap binding with the following
>>> +changes:
>>
>> Maybe be a bit more specific and say 'based on the input/matrix-keymap.txt binding'..
>
> OK.
>
>>> + * keypad,num-rows and keypad,num-columns are required.
>>
>> Is linux,keymap required from matrix-keymap.txt?
>
> Yes, matrix-keymap.txt contains descriptions for the following:
>
> required:
> - linux,keymap
So you don't say that linux,keymap is required for twl4030-keypad (wasn't clear if you assumed that or not).
> optional:
> - keypad,num-rows
> - keypad,num-columns
>
>>> +Optional Properties specific to linux:
>>> +- linux,keypad-no-autorepeat: do no enable autorepeat feature.
>>
>> Does it make sense to update the matrix-keymap.txt binding to add
>> 'linux,keypad-no-autorepeat' there?
>
> At least according to devicetree documentation there are
> keymap-matrix.txt based drivers, which do not support
> "linux,keypad-no-autorepeat".
Which is why it could be optional in keymap-matrix.txt. I dont know anything about keymap/keypad's just asking the question?
It seems as if linux,keypad-no-autorepeat is intended to mean the same thing (if relevant to the device) across all drivers. Is that correct? If so it seems like moving it to be specified in a generic input binding makes sense, just not sure if keymap-matrix.txt is that place or not.
- k
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list