[RFC PATCH] kernel/kallsyms.c: only show legal kernel symbol
Rusty Russell
rusty at rustcorp.com.au
Thu Oct 24 19:08:19 EDT 2013
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux at arm.linux.org.uk> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:51:18AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Ming Lei <tom.leiming at gmail.com> writes:
>> > Address of non-module kernel symbol should always be located
>> > from CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET on, so only show these legal kernel
>> > symbols in /proc/kallsyms.
>> >
>> > On ARM, some symbols(see below) may drop in relocatable code, so
>> > perf can't parse kernel symbols any more from /proc/kallsyms, this
>> > patch fixes the problem.
>> >
>> > 00000000 t __vectors_start
>> > 00000020 A cpu_v7_suspend_size
>> > 00001000 t __stubs_start
>> > 00001004 t vector_rst
>> > 00001020 t vector_irq
>> > 000010a0 t vector_dabt
>> > 00001120 t vector_pabt
>> > 000011a0 t vector_und
>> > 00001220 t vector_addrexcptn
>> > 00001224 t vector_fiq
>> > 00001224 T vector_fiq_offset
>> >
>> > The issue can be fixed in scripts/kallsyms.c too, but looks this
>> > approach is easier.
>>
>> This fix looks hacky; if these symbols are not available, don't just
>> remove them from /proc/kallsyms, but don't put them in the kernel at
>> all.
>
> How do you "don't put them in the kernel at all" when they're used by
> the kernel internally as offsets?
Sorry, I was imprecise. I was referring to the kernel's kallsyms
tables produced by scripts/kallsyms.c. This patch left them in the
the kallsyms tables and filtered them out from /proc/kallsyms.
It's weird that cpu_v7_suspend_size appeared above, since kallsyms
should filter out 'A' symbols already.
> If you mean, just get rid of them, shall I just add these as magic
> numbers instead based on the values in this email? Is that really a
> sane solution?
>
> No, we have to keep these symbols IMHO.
Can you make them absolute symbols? That should Just Work for kallsyms.
Cheers,
Rusty.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list