[Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or is there something better?

[Nicolas Pitre]

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, David Woodhouse wrote:

> 
> > So it is time IMHO that the description of how things *shall* work be
> > itself revised.
> 
> It *is* being revised, with an explicit explicit understanding that things
> will have to change and a defined process for how to cope with that.

Good.

Your previous emails seemed to imply that the lack of binding stability 
enforcement was the problem.

And you said: "our defined processes for coping are based on the 
assumption that it (mistakes) should be rare". I think this statement is 
wrong.  So if this is what's being revised then fine.



Nicolas