[Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or is there something better?
Richard Cochran
richardcochran at gmail.com
Thu Oct 24 10:32:52 EDT 2013
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 04:19:56PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> While I agree that many of these screwups shouldn't have happened in the
> first place, it's nothing that we were prepared for two years ago. At
> some point everyone agreed that DT was the way forward, so DT is what we
> did. Nobody said anything about stable ABI back then, so nobody cared.
The idea of a device tree has not changed. I guess the arm crowd
jumped on the DT bandwagon with no clue what it was about.
> We treated DT the same way we had treated platform data before, which
> has inevitable lead to the current mess, which is only slightly better
> than what we used to have.
So, are you saying that arm/dt is a failure?
(I won't argue with you on that point.)
Thanks,
Richard
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list