[PATCHv4] video: backlight: gpio-backlight: Add DT support.

[Thierry Reding]

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 06:58:33AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 11:13 Mon 21 Oct     , Denis Carikli wrote:
> > Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie at rpsys.net>
> > Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han at samsung.com>
> > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring at calxeda.com>
> > Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll at arm.com>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> > Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org>
> > Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree at hellion.org.uk>
> > Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel at pengutronix.de>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: Lothar Waßmann <LW at KARO-electronics.de>
> > Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> > Cc: Eric Bénard <eric at eukrea.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Denis Carikli <denis at eukrea.com>
> > ---
> > ChangeLog v3->v4:
> > - The default-brightness property is now optional, it defaults to 1 if not set.
> by default we set OFF not ON
> 
> do not actiate driver or properti by default you can not known to consequence
> on the hw

Turning on a backlight by default is what pretty much every backlight
driver does. I personally think that's the wrong default, I even tried
to get some discussion started recently about how we could change this.
However, given that this has been the case for possibly as long as the
subsystem has existed, suddenly changing it might cause quite a few of
our users to boot the new kernel and not see their display come up. As
with any other ABI, this isn't something we can just change without a
very good migration path.

In my opinion every backlight should be hooked up to a display panel,
and the display panel driver should be the one responsible for turning
the backlight on or off. That's the only way we can guarantee that the
backlight is turned on at the right moment so that glitches can be
avoided.

One possible migration path would be to update all display panel drivers
to cope with an associated backlight device, but even if somebody would
even find the time to write the code to do that, I can imagine that we'd
have a hard time getting this tested since a lot of the boards that rely
on these backlight drivers are legacy and probably no longer very
actively used.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131022/48b53d2c/attachment.sig>