[RESEND PATCH v2 2/6] ARM: dts: Specify clocks for UARTs on bcm11351

[Sebastian Hesselbarth]

On 10/17/2013 07:41 AM, Christian Daudt wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Tim Kryger <tim.kryger at linaro.org> wrote:
>> Rather than declaring the frequency of the external clock, specify the
>> label of the clock such that the driver may determine the frequency on
>> its own.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger at linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Markus Mayer <markus.mayer at linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Matt Porter <matt.porter at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351.dtsi | 8 ++++----
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351.dtsi
>> index c6464fb..ce65367 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351.dtsi
>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
>>                  compatible = "brcm,bcm11351-dw-apb-uart", "snps,dw-apb-uart";
>>                  status = "disabled";
>>                  reg = <0x3e000000 0x1000>;
>> -               clock-frequency = <13000000>;
>> +               clocks = <&uartb_clk>;
>>                  interrupts = <GIC_SPI 67 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>                  reg-shift = <2>;
>>                  reg-io-width = <4>;
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>   this patch series (and a subsequent one from Tim) both rely on your
> "ARM: provide common arch init for DT clocks" patchset in order to
> work. Will that patchset be in 3.13 ? I don't want to pull the dt mods
> unless they are as they break the boot without them.

Christian,

here is the pull request [1], pull [2], and stable commitment for the
branch [3]. You can merge that branch too and name the dependency when
you send your PR, arm-soc maintainers will sort it out.

Besides a small section mismatch fixup for nomadik that Olof requested,
I guess it is in.

Sebastian

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg276175.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg277816.html
[3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg279736.html