[GIT PULL 3/6] omap hwmod changes for v3.13 merge window

Kevin Hilman khilman at linaro.org
Tue Oct 15 10:00:59 EDT 2013


On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman at linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 14, 2013 9:12 PM, "Olof Johansson" <olof at lixom.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 03:44:44PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> > Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> writes:
>>> >
>>> > > The following changes since commit
>>> > > d0e639c9e06d44e713170031fe05fb60ebe680af:
>>> > >
>>> > >   Linux 3.12-rc4 (2013-10-06 14:00:20 -0700)
>>> > >
>>> > > are available in the git repository at:
>>> > >
>>> > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap
>>> > > tags/omap-for-v3.13/hwmod-signed
>>> > >
>>> > > for you to fetch changes up to
>>> > > 254f57a92987b6cde6004f58d6b847813dfb9e0e:
>>> > >
>>> > >   ARM: OMAP5: hwmod: add missing ocp2scp hwmod data (2013-10-11
>>> > > 15:37:05 -0700)
>>> > >
>>> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > omap hwmod related changes via Paul Walmsley <paul at pwsan.com>:
>>> > >
>>> > > Some OMAP hwmod changes for 3.13.  Significant changes here include:
>>> > >
>>> > > - support for moving some of the hwmod flags to DT data
>>> > >
>>> > > - support for the SSI, hardware spinlock, USB host/TLL, and RNG IP
>>> > >   blocks for various OMAPs
>>> > >
>>> > > - a fix that again decouples hwmod data changes from unrelated DT data
>>> > >   patchsets
>>> > >
>>> > > Basic test logs are available at:
>>> > >
>>> > > http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/prcm_fixes_v3.13/20131009094936/
>>> > >
>>> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > Pulled into next/soc,
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
>>> > Kevin
>>>
>>> Hm, looks like my BBB hit this on v3.12-rc4-493-g1a9df23, which is pushed
>>> to
>>> to-build but not for-next yet. I'm guessing this might be what Kevin
>>> pinged me
>>> about on IRC today but I was out and unavailable most of the day.
>>
>> Hmmm... mine seems to have booted fine on that build...
>> http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/kernel-build-reports/2013-October/000666.html
>
> Well, it's a WARN_ON() not a panic, so my script probably shouldn't
> have aborted the boot (and your script should have reported it :-).

Yes indeed, it's been on my todo list to catch/report those.

> Check your local log to see if you have something in there?

Yup, there are a few backtraces due to the warns.

Kevin



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list