[PATCH 2/2] PCI: imx6: Fix the clock for PCIe
Shawn Guo
shawn.guo at linaro.org
Sat Oct 12 03:13:15 EDT 2013
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 01:55:04PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > It is because driver part was merged into PCI tree by Bjorn Helgaas,[1]
> > and arch part was merged into i.MX tree by Shawn Guo.[2]
> > Thus, your patch can make the conflict issue.
> >
> > For example,
> > [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: imx6qdl: Fix the clock for PCIe
> > [PATCH 2/2] PCI: imx6: Fix the clock for PCIe
> >
> > Then, 1st patch can be merged to i.MX tree, and 2nd patch can be merged
> > to PCI tree.
> >
> > If I am wrong, please let me know kindly. :-)
>
> By all means, you're right. Is the patch addressing the issue correctly (if we
> ignore that it's not split)? Shawn?
I need to first understand if you are seeing the issue with the latest
linux-next like next-20131010. Note, linux-next tree goes to
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next [1] these days.
Shawn
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/30/179
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list