[PATCH 0/5] Armada DRM stuff

Rob Clark robdclark at gmail.com
Wed Oct 9 10:48:34 EDT 2013


On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux at arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:47:55PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> On 10/07/2013 12:07 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> The Armada DRM drivers again, along with the TDA998x HDMI output support,
>>> and an illustration to show how to add Armada 610 support (and others.)
>>>
>>> Rob has looked at this a couple of times since its last posting, and
>>> has provided additional useful feedback which has been incorporated.
>>> I believe all the major issues have been addressed now.
>>
>> Tested-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com>
>>
>> on Marvell Armada 510, SolidRun CuBox with quick-hack DT support added.
>>
>> Let's please get this driver mainlined and start working on proper DT
>> support for it. Thanks for driver and the patience to work out all
>> issues!
>
> Sebastian,
>
> I've added your tested-by now, and also updated the TDA998x patch to use
> the HDMI definitions that Jean-Francois pointed out (which is a really
> small delta, so isn't worth resending the patch set just for that).
> Thanks.
>
> All the points brought up in previous reviews concerning the physical
> address exposure, and the location of the DRM helpers have all been
> addressed, so it is now ready to be merged into mainline.  So now the
> question is how to proceed with it.
>
> However, I see no response from any DRM developers, even though they are
> around - they've been responding on a different thread about driver
> model/sysfs abuse by DRM.
>
> I'm going to pull it into my nightly build tree so it can have some
> testing with non-dove builds, and if there's still no response from
> DRM people next week, I'll put it in to linux-next via my tree so at
> least it can get some exposure and integration validation there.

fyi, I think this is in pretty good shape.. I've reviewed earlier
versions, and had an initial look at this version which addresses my
concerns, although I still intend to give a closer review of the final
version (still on my TODO list, but we have a bit of time before 3.13
merge window.. I should at least get to it by the weekend)

BR,
-R



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list