[PATCH 1/2] clk: tegra114: Rename gr_2d/gr_3d to gr2d/gr3d

[Mike Turquette]

Quoting Stephen Warren (2013-10-04 10:00:38)
> On 10/02/2013 03:12 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > These clocks were named gr2d and gr3d on Tegra20 and Tegra30, so use the
> > same names on Tegra114 for consistency.
> 
> The series,
> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
> 
> Although I wonder if there will be merge conflicts with Peter's "clk:
> tegra: replace enum tegra114_clk by binding header"?

There are merge conflicts in other places too. The latest clk-next
branch is based on -rc3 with only a few patches (publicly) applied so
far. As of the time of this writing the top-most commit is
96a7ed9079a3483c5681b17f4713c37c1cf2b1c9.

Can the Tegra folks send me a pull request with the following
patches applied? (likely in this order):

ARM: tegra114: add missing clocks to binding
clk: tegra: replace enum tegra114_clk by binding header
[PATCH v2] clk: tegra: Correct sbc mux width & parent
clk: tegra: Fix vde/2d/3d clock src offset
clk: tegra: Set the clock parent of gr2d/gr3d to pll_c2
clk: tegra: Set the clk parent of host1x to pll_p
clk: tegra114: Rename gr_2d/gr_3d to gr2d/gr3d
clk: tegra114: Initialize gr2d clock

The set of patches above (with their functional dependencies) were
giving me some conflict resolution issues (e.g. large data tables that
needed to be updated in clk-tegra-114.c) against the latest clk-next.

Additionally I've looked at the following patches on the list which can
be added to the pull request if you want (these patches all look fine
but I haven't yet Acked each individually):

clk: tegra30: Don't wait for PLL_U lock bit
clk: tegra114: Initialize host1x and related clocks
clk: tegra: PLLE spread spectrum control (with updated changelog)

If there are plans to spin a v3 of "Introduce common infra for tegra
clocks" then basing it on top of this tegra pull request would be nice.

Let me know if this is a problem for you.

Regards,
Mike