[PATCH v2 00/12] clk/exynos convert clock IDs to macros

[Kukjin Kim]

Mike Turquette wrote:
> 
> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-09-30 03:11:41)
> > Mike Turquette wrote:
> > >
> > > Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2013-09-16 07:33:45)
> > > > On 09/12/2013 12:50 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > > > Well...I'm not sure changing to use macro is better or not at this
> > > moment...
> > > >
> > > > I think it is. ;) It's really less error prone to have symbolic
> names
> > > instead
> > > > of the plain numbers. The clock ids are defined in one place and it
> is
> > > more
> > > > clear what a clock is by looking at symbolic name. It's especially
> > > annoying
> > > > to use plain numbers where are are many clock in a single node, like
> 10
> > > or
> > > > more. What are you main concerns with this ?
> > >
> > > I think having the symbolic names is a win for readability.
> > >
> > Hmm...since Mike who is a maintainer for ccf agrees with Sylwester's
> opinion, so I agree. Actually, I had no strong objection on this but still
> I'm not sure using macro is really better because sometimes the name
> doesn't give readability really I think though.
> >
> > Mike, can you give me your ack on clk stuff?
> 
> Yes, but I was thinking to take this change through the clk tree. The
> new branch based on -rc3 will be published tonight.
> 
> Let me know if it causes problems for you for me to take it.
> 
Uhm, I think dt changes can make ugly conflicts because of spread dt changing?

- Kukjin