[PATCH] serial: mxs-auart: wait for DMA buffer to flush before shutdown

[Hector Palacios]

Hi Uwe,

On 10/02/2013 10:30 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Hector,
>
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:09:10AM +0200, Hector Palacios wrote:
>> On 10/02/2013 09:44 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:31:16AM +0200, Hector Palacios wrote:
>>>> On 10/01/2013 09:48 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 06:18:35PM +0200, Hector Palacios wrote:
>>>>>> +		/* Wait enough time to flush DMA buffer completely */
>>>>>> +		to = u->timeout * UART_XMIT_SIZE / u->fifosize;
>>>>> u->timeout is the time needed to send one char, right? UART_XMIT_SIZE is
>>>>> the size of the circular buffer, fifosize is the size of the fifo. I
>>>>> don't get what you get by dividing by the fifosize. I would have
>>>>> expected something like:
>>>>>
>>>>> 	u->timeout * min(UART_XMIT_SIZE, u->fifosize)
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you explain, maybe in a comment along the code for the next person
>>>>> not understanding?
>>>>
>>>> u->timeout is *not* the time needed to send one char but the time
>>>> needed to flush the complete port fifo (see uart_update_timeout() in
>>>> serial_core.c where it is set).
>>> Ah, right. (BTW, uart_update_timeout should better round up instead of
>>> round down, i.e.
>>> -	port->timeout = (HZ * bits) / baud + HZ/50;
>>> +	port->timeout = DIV_ROUND_UP(HZ * bits, baud) + HZ/50;
>>> )
>>>
>>>> UART_XMIT_SIZE is the number of bytes in the DMA buffer, so I divide
>>>> the max number of bytes in the FIFO by the FIFO size and multiply by
>>>> the FIFO timeout.
>>> ditto here, better round up. Although I think using a completion could
>>> shorten the timeout considerably because there are often less than
>>> UART_XMIT_SIZE chars in the buffer?!
>>
>> I'm not really waiting the full timeout. I'm checking for TX fifo
>> empty every 1ms and for a maximum of 'to' ms.
> Correct. Still using DIV_ROUND_UP would be better, right?

I think it is not really needed, after all the code is adding HZ/50 of slop which acts 
like a round up, doesn't it?

	/*
	 * Figure the timeout to send the above number of bits.
	 * Add .02 seconds of slop
	 */
	port->timeout = (HZ * bits) / baud + HZ/50;

Best regards,
--
Hector Palacios