[RFC 0/4] Cleanup PRM and CM regbit headers
Rajendra Nayak
rnayak at ti.com
Tue Jun 25 04:43:37 EDT 2013
On Tuesday 25 June 2013 12:44 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> Rajendra Nayak (4):
>> > ARM: OMAP2: PRM/CM: Cleanup unused header contents
>> > ARM: OMAP3: PRM/CM: Cleanup unused header contents
>> > ARM: OMAP4: PRM/CM: Cleanup unused header contents
>> > ARM: OMAP5: PRM/CM: Cleanup unused header contents
>> >
>> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm-regbits-24xx.h | 317 ----
>> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm-regbits-33xx.h | 758 ---------
>> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm-regbits-34xx.h | 631 --------
>> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm-regbits-44xx.h | 1557 -------------------
>> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm-regbits-54xx.h | 1632 -------------------
>> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm-regbits-24xx.h | 246 ---
>> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm-regbits-33xx.h | 305 ----
>> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm-regbits-34xx.h | 480 ------
>> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm-regbits-44xx.h | 2225 --------------------------
>> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm-regbits-54xx.h | 2677 --------------------------------
>> > 10 files changed, 10828 deletions(-)
> If things build and work after applying this, I suggest we send them
> as a clean-up branch right after -rc1.
They build fine, and I boot tested on the omap4/5 boards that I have too.
(I had the out of tree clock data pulled in for omap5 before I did this
cleanup).
>
> It seems that build testing and then randconfig testing
> should be enough for these if they are unused and only
> removal.
Right, I'll do more testing and even though they should just boot
fine on the omap2/3 boards too since all thats removed is anyway
unused, I will still do more sanity test before posting them on -rc1.
regards,
Rajendra
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list