[RFC PATCH v1 1/6] USB: HCD: support giveback of URB in tasklet context
Ming Lei
ming.lei at canonical.com
Fri Jun 21 05:13:48 EDT 2013
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Oliver Neukum <oneukum at suse.de> wrote:
> On Friday 21 June 2013 09:12:38 Ming Lei wrote:
>> >> This should be enough since during remove path usbcore will wait for all
>> >> URBs' completion which is only triggered by tasklet, so once all URBs are
>> >> finished, the tasklet list has been empty already.
>> >
>> > No, usbcore only waits until the urb_list for each endpoint is empty.
>> > It doesn't keep track of the individual URB completions. Look at
>> > usb_hcd_flush_endpoint() and you'll see.
>>
>> But, if URBs still aren't completed after usb_disconnect(), it should be
>> bug of usbcore or driver, shouldn't it?
>
> A driver cannot know what caused the call to disconnect(). That includes
> driver unbind. Doing IO to a device that another driver may be bound to
> is certainly a bug.
> Nevertheless it usually works and it is desirable to keep that behavior.
I mean once driver is unbound, URB's complete() in that driver shouldn't be
called. The situation might happen when driver->remove() doesn't
kill the URBs with the patch applied.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list