[PATCH v2] ARM/KVM: save and restore generic timer registers
Alexander Graf
agraf at suse.de
Thu Jun 20 18:02:02 EDT 2013
On 20.06.2013, at 23:59, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 20 June 2013 22:55, Alexander Graf <agraf at suse.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 20.06.2013, at 22:37, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:29:30PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>> On 20 June 2013 19:32, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>> Marc wrote:
>>>>>> So there is just one thing we absolutely need to make sure here: no vcpu
>>>>>> can run before they've all had their timer restored, and hence a stable
>>>>>> cntvoff. Otherwise two vcpus will have a different view of time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can we guarantee this?
>>>>
>>>>> Do we need to? User space is free to modify time and all sort of other
>>>>> registers at any point during VM execution - it will just break the
>>>>> guest that it's running.
>>>>
>>>> Note that QEMU will stop all CPUs before doing a migration or
>>>> similar operation. However there is a monitor command to query
>>>> the current CPU registers etc which won't try to stop the VM
>>>> first. So we might try to read vcpu registers (though I hope we
>>>> don't allow writing them).
>>>>
>>> Sounds like we need to add a -EBUSY return on SET_ONE_REG if the VM is
>>> running.
>>
>> The ONE_REG API should already be protected here, as it does
>> vcpu_load() in kvm_vcpu_ioctl(). So a separate thread can't possibly
>> do ONE_REG accesses while another thread has the same vcpu running.
>
> Doesn't protect you against confusion due to another thread running
> a different vcpu in the same vm, though.
Ah, different ONE_REG API. Can't you just notify all vcpus to exit and refresh their timers? That's what kvm_make_request() is there for, no?
Alex
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list