linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the net-next tree
Sergei Shtylyov
sergei.shtylyov at cogentembedded.com
Tue Jun 18 10:36:39 EDT 2013
Hello.
On 18-06-2013 12:33, Bastian Hecht wrote:
> Sergei is completely right I think. He was sceptic about the commit in
> a mail some days ago already. Unfortunately I recently haven't had
> access to my development environment to check what's up with this
> patch. I'm sorry that it ended up to you both to deal with it. I have
> written some simple bindings for the sh-eth and wanted to use it for
> our DT reference version for the Armadillo board but discarded it as I
> saw Nobuhiro Iwamatsu, the author of the sh-eth driver, cooked up some
> more mature version. I don't see them in the next branch of Simon, so
> until they appear there we can delete commit 9e0b428f079d ("ARM:
It won't appear there. I'll just NAK it, I think I've alredy told
Iwamatsu-san that the full blown device tree binding for this driver is
no-go. The best we can do is use OF_DEV_AUXDATA() to rename the DT
sourced platform device to a traditional one and assign to it the
platform data.
> shmobile: r8a7740: Add interim sh-eth device name to clocks list")
Unfortunately, it's now too late to just delete it at this point. I
missed the patch unfortunately when it was just submitted.
> that is only needed for sh-eth DT usage.
> Thanks,
> Bastian
WBR, Sergei
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list