[PATCH 00/15] Final Samsung PWM support cleanup

Tomasz Figa tomasz.figa at gmail.com
Thu Jun 13 05:07:38 EDT 2013


Hi Heiko, Sylwester,

On Thursday 13 of June 2013 01:52:05 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 06/13/2013 01:38 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013, 01:13:47 schrieb Tomasz Figa:
> >> Hi Olof,
> >> 
> >> On Wednesday 12 of June 2013 16:00:23 Olof Johansson wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:48:56PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >>>>> Needs testing on other platforms as I could only compile test for
> >>>>> them.
> >>> 
> >>> How/who can help here? WHo has and still cares for other affected
> >>> platforms?
> >>> 
> >>>>> 66 files changed, 627 insertions(+), 1580 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> I will try to test this on Exynos 4 at work, if I somehow manage to
> >> find any way to use PWM on our boards (other than already-tested PWM
> >> clocksource).
> >> 
> >> Unfortunately, except S3C6410, I don't have access to other
> >> platforms, or at least I won't in any reasonable time.
> >> 
> >> If I remember correctly, in case of my watchdog support cleanup,
> >> Kukjin
> >> has been able to test it on S5P64x0.
> >> 
> >> Heiko and Sylwester used to have some s3c24xx-based boards, not sure
> >> if
> >> they still do and are interested in their support in mainline.
> >> 
> >> So all left is S5PC100 (for which I couldn't find anyone who cares)
> >> and
> >> Exynos5.
> >> 
> >>> Nice cleanup.
> >> 
> >> Thanks.
> >> 
> >>>> Any comments for this series?
> >>> 
> >>> Yes, above. :) In general looks good -- testing coverage is a bit of
> >>> a
> >>> concern.
> >> 
> >> Yeah. Unfortunately all I could do was testing on Tiny6410 and
> >> compile
> >> testing on others. I hope we find some really helpful people over
> >> here who could waste a bit of their precious time for this museum.
> >> ;)
> > 
> > I'll try to give it a testrun tomorrow. And my s3c2416 will always be
> > the first-love-architecture for me ;-)
> 
> I'll likely test it tomorrow on a Mini2440 board, I was going to do it
> earlier
> but got distracted by plenty other things that needed attention too. At
> least
> that's one of the reasons I got the board - testing the cross-platform
> cleanups
> and ensuring they are not breaking the older platforms.

Thank you both for your support. Looking forward for testing results :)

Best regards,
Tomasz




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list