[GIT PULL v2] at91: USBA DT support / drivers update for 3.11 #1

[Olof Johansson]

On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:05:39PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Arnd, Olof,
> 
> This is a rework of the previous pull-request done by Jean-Christophe
> PLAGNIOL-VILLARD last week ([GIT PULL] at91: USBA DT support for 3.11).
> You should see that this material is based on the cleanup branch that you
> already have in arm-soc/at91/cleanup.
> 
> This adds the DT support for USBA gadget driver present in the most recent
> AT91 SoCs.
> As agreed with Arnd and Felipe we send these drivers updates via arm-soc.
> 
> Thanks, best regards,
> 
> The following changes since commit b3f442b0eedbc20b5ce3f4a96530588d14901199:
> 
>   ARM: at91: udpate defconfigs (2013-05-17 15:05:08 +0200)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-drivers
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to a375f12dde25a7e89acd75d066d0225657d7dfc2:
> 
>   ARM: at91: sam9m10g45ek add udc DT support (2013-05-24 07:15:20 +0800)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Adding the DT support to UBB gadget High-Speed aka usba.
> It updates the driver and all device tree files
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (7):
>       USB: gadget: atmel_usba: move global struct usba_ep usba_ep to struct usba_udc
>       USB: gadget: atmel_usba: allow multi instance
>       USB: gadget: atmel_usba: add DT support
>       ARM: at91: sam9x5 add udc DT support
>       ARM: at91: sam9x5ek add udc DT support
>       ARM: at91: sam9g45 add udc DT support
>       ARM: at91: sam9m10g45ek add udc DT support

Hi,

So, now you have multiple branches updating the DT files on at91, and they all
conflict due to add/add or add/change.

This branch is really two separate things already: three driver patches for
next/drivers, and 4 devicetree updates that can go on top of the previous
at91/dt branch. That should remove every DT conflict.

Care to reshuffle?

Thanks,

-Olof