[PATCH 0/6] Samsung watchdog support clean-up

[Kukjin Kim]

Tomasz Figa wrote:
> 
> Hi Kukjin,
> 
> On Tuesday 04 of June 2013 18:37:54 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > Hi Sylwester, Kukjin,
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > On Saturday 01 of June 2013 10:16:52 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > > > Hi Tomasz,
> > > >
> > > > On 05/19/2013 12:37 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > > This series is aiming at cleaning up a bit watchdog support on Samsung
> > > > > SoCs. The patches tweak a bit all the watchdog handling code here and
> > > > > there, with the goal of making it DT- and multiplatform-friendly.
> > > > >
> > > > > See particular patches for more detailed descriptions.
> > > > >
> > > > > On S3C6410-based Tiny6410 board (Mini6410-compatible):
> > > > >
> > > > > Tested-by: Tomasz Figa<tomasz.figa at gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > I've tested this series on a s3c2440 based board. The system restart
> > > > works fine.
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki at gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Thank you Sylwester for testing this series.
> >
> > Thanks again :-)
> >
> > > Kukjin, since it has been already tested on s3c24xx and s3c64xx and nobody
> > > seems to care about s5p64x0 and s5pc100 (although I don't see a reason why
> > > these patches should break them), could we have this series applied?
> >
> > OK, let me test this series on the smdk64x0 then, will apply.
> >
> > If any problems, let you know.
> >
> > Thanks for your gentle reminder.
> 
> Thank you for handling this. I have a lot of patches for S3C64xx depending on
> this series queued in my private tree and it would be really nice if I could
> finally get them merged for 3.11.
> 
Applied, thanks.

- Kukjin