[PATCH 13/13] ARM: Exynos: extend soft-reset support for Exynos5420

[Kukjin Kim]

Tushar Behera wrote:
> 
> On 06/06/2013 04:31 PM, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> > Extend the soft reset support for Exynos5420 SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap at linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c |    3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
> > index fbe1aa7..dc7c134 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
> > @@ -321,7 +321,8 @@ void exynos5_restart(char mode, const char *cmd)
> >  	u32 val;
> >  	void __iomem *addr;
> >
> > -	if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250")) {
> > +	if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250") ||
> > +		(of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5420"))) {
> >  		val = 0x1;
> >  		addr = EXYNOS_SWRESET;
> >  	} else if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440")) {
> >
> 
> How about making 0x1 and EXYNOS_SWRESET as default values of val and
> addr. That way we can remove this check for exynos5250 and exynos5420.
> Also we can remove the trailing else statement as there are no non-DT
> boards for EXYNOS5.
> 
>  void exynos5_restart(char mode, const char *cmd)
>  {
>         struct device_node *np;
> -       u32 val;
> -       void __iomem *addr;
> +       u32 val = 0x1;
> +       void __iomem *addr = EXYNOS_SWRESET;
> 
> -       if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250")) {
> -               val = 0x1;
> -               addr = EXYNOS_SWRESET;
> -       } else if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440")) {
> +       if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440")) {
>                 u32 status;
>                 np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
> "samsung,exynos5440-clock");
> 
> @@ -336,9 +333,6 @@ void exynos5_restart(char mode, const char *cmd)
>                 val = __raw_readl(addr);
> 
>                 val = (val & 0xffff0000) | (status & 0xffff);
> -       } else {
> -               pr_err("%s: cannot support non-DT\n", __func__);
> -               return;
>         }
> 
> --

Yeah, looks better.

- Kukjin