[PATCH V2 14/14] ARM: OMAP4: hwmod data: Clean up the data file

[Santosh Shilimkar]

On Friday 07 June 2013 02:37 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> [130607 11:20]:
>> On Friday 07 June 2013 01:50 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> [130607 09:35]:
>>>> * Paul Walmsley <paul at pwsan.com> [130607 05:38]:
>>>>> On Fri, 7 Jun 2013, Sricharan R wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> - The IO resource information like dma request lines, irq number and
>>>>>>   ocp address space can be populated via dt blob. So such data is stripped
>>>>>>   from OMAP4 SOC hwmod data file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - The devices which are still missing the device tree bindings,
>>>>>>   address space entries are not removed yet. When such devices add
>>>>>>   the dt bindings, respective address space data can be deleted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Also other unnecessary hwmods like firewalls are removed as a part of this.
>>>>>>   Since emif was getting registered only because of this firewalls links,
>>>>>>   the mpu->emif direct link is added now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The above update, results in reduction of about ~1650 lines of code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <r.sricharan at ti.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Paul Walmsley <paul at pwsan.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Can't test this one since I don't have an OMAP4 DT config set up in the testbed
>>>>> yet.  Maybe will add that to the testbed after the v3.10 release.
>>>>
>>>> OK thanks, applying into omap-for-v3.11/cleanup.
>>>
>>> I had to undo the following parts to avoid regressions on omap4sdp.
>>> Can you please follow up on fixing the related issues so the fixup
>>> won't be needed?
>>>
>>> Seems to work now the same way as earlier for both omap4sdp and blaze
>>> es, except for DSS, which seems to be a separate issue as posted by
>>> Tomi. Pushed out now to omap-for-v3.11/cleanup.
>>>
>> Thats strange. You shouldn't need those fixes since that data is
>> expected to be coming from DT.
>>
>> Sricharan, Can you please try out the patch against Tony's
>> V3.11/clean-up branch and see whats missing there.
> 
> Looking at the diff output with and without, it seems to be that the
> DMA channels won't get configured.
> 
That should work since DMA engine changes are in mainline and the
DMA channel information is already in DT.

regards,
Santosh