[PATCH V4 2/4] clk: samsung: register audio subsystem clocks using common clock framework

[Doug Anderson]

Andrew,

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Bresticker <abrestic at chromium.org> wrote:
>> I think this is supposed to be "xxti" which might or might not be
>> "fin_pll".  In the exynos4 code these are two different clocks that
>> are chosen by OM[0].  I'd bet that 99% of the time they are the same,
>> but it seems better to use "xxti".
>
> OM[0] also appears to mux the input here between "xxti" and "xusbxti"
> as well.  So this should probably remain "fin_pll".

Thanks!  ...so I'm OK with this landing "as-is" or a re-spin with nits
fixed, since all of the rest of my comments were just nits...