[PATCH] ARM: zynq: wfi exit on same cpu is valid
Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezcano at linaro.org
Mon Jun 3 04:14:24 EDT 2013
On 05/31/2013 12:44 PM, Sanjay Singh Rawat wrote:
> The current code considers every wakeup as spurious, which is not
> correct. Handle the same way as other arm platforms are doing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sanjay Singh Rawat <sanjay.rawat at linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano at linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-zynq/hotplug.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/hotplug.c
> index c89672b..a1ab22c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/hotplug.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/hotplug.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,13 @@ static inline void zynq_platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
> dsb();
> wfi();
>
> + if (pen_release == cpu_logical_map(cpu)) {
> + /*
> + * OK, proper wakeup, we're done
> + */
> + break;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Getting here, means that we have come out of WFI without
> * having been woken up - this shouldn't happen
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list