linux-next: Tree for May 30
Stephen Rothwell
sfr at canb.auug.org.au
Mon Jun 3 02:36:33 EDT 2013
Hi Geert,
On Thu, 30 May 2013 10:07:48 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> The following defconfigs fail without anything useful in the log:
> - at91sam9g20_defconfig
> - at91sam9261_defconfig
> - at91sam9260_defconfig
>
> A manual run reveals why:
> Can't find default configuration "arch/arm/configs/at91sam9g20_defconfig"!
>
> This is due to the merge of several config files:
>
> commit b3f442b0eedbc20b5ce3f4a96530588d14901199
> Author: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> Date: Wed May 15 17:19:21 2013 +0200
>
> ARM: at91: udpate defconfigs
>
> Merge 9g20 with 9260 and 9g10 with 9261 as those SoCs can run from the same
> kernel even in non DT world.
>
> Fix the sam9261ek to allow 9g10 and sam9261 to compile together.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com>
Thanks for letting me know. I have stopped those three configs from
being built.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr at canb.auug.org.au
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130603/317cceb2/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list