[PATCH 09/21] ARM: OMAP: devkit8000: use new display drivers

[Tomi Valkeinen]

On 30/07/13 08:48, Archit Taneja wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Friday 26 July 2013 12:38 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> Use new display drivers for devkit8000 board.
>>
>> The new OMAP display drivers were merged for 3.11, and we can now change
>> the board files to use the new ones and phase out the old ones.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen at ti.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c | 96
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>   1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c
>> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c
>> index f1d91ba..cdc4fb9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c
>> @@ -112,50 +112,81 @@ static struct regulator_consumer_supply
>> devkit8000_vio_supply[] = {
>>       REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vcc", "spi2.0"),
>>   };
>>
>> -static struct panel_generic_dpi_data lcd_panel = {
>> -    .name            = "innolux_at070tn83",
>> -    /* gpios filled in code */
>> +static const struct display_timing devkit8000_lcd_videomode = {
>> +    .pixelclock    = { 0, 40000000, 0 },
> 
> This is unrelated to the work being done here, but noticed that the
> pixel clock for this panel seems to be too high for the given timings.
> It puts the refresh rate around 90 Hz, which is odd.

So it does... Quick googling found the specs for the panel, but even
with the typical values in the spec I get somewhwat odd refresh rate.

Well, as you said, it's unrelated to these changes. I guess it's better
not to touch it.

 Tomi


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 901 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130730/9d5e4692/attachment.sig>