[PATCH V2 2/8] ASoC: Samsung: I2S: Add quirks as driver data in I2S

[Padma Venkat]

Hi Mark,

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:06:46PM +0530, Padmavathi Venna wrote:
>> Samsung has different versions of I2S introduced in different
>> platforms. Each version has some new support added for multichannel,
>> secondary fifo, s/w reset control and internal mux for rclk src clk.
>> Each newly added change has a quirk. So this patch adds all the
>> required quirks as driver data and based on compatible string from
>> dtsi fetches the quirks.
>
> As Russell indicated you should really keep the old name around, though
> marking them as deprecated is OK.  However I'm not sure anyone will have
> deployed this so I'm not sure how much it matters - every downstream
> kernel I've seen was still using board files anyway.


This is there only on exynos5250.dtsi, so changing this file alone is
enough. patch3 in
this series have the same.

>
> The actual meat of the patch changing to a quirk scheme does look good,
> though.
>
>> -- compatible : "samsung,i2s-v5"
>> +- compatible : should be one of the following.
>> +   - samsung,s3c6410-i2s: for 8/16/24bit stereo I2S. Previous versions
>> +     has only 8/16bit support.
>> +   - samsung,s3c6410-i2sv4: for 8/16/24bit multichannel(5.1 channel) I2S.
>> +     Introduced in s3c6410. This also applicable for s5p64x0 platforms.
>> +   - samsung,s5pc100-i2s: for 8/16/24bit multichannel(5.1 channel) I2S
>> +     with secondary fifo and s/w reset control.
>> +   - samsung,s5pv210-i2s: for 8/16/24bit multichannel(5.1) I2S with
>> +     secondary fifo, s/w reset control and internal mux for root clk src.
>> +
>
> I think the -vN naming scheme was fine - I see where this came from but
> the main point was about having things identified by a string not
> switching the naming scheme.  As you can see from the s3c6410 stuff the
> SoC isn't that helpful as a naming scheme as multiple IP versions appear
> on the same SoC.

Having only the version info is confusing. When I posted my previous version of
patches I was clear which version introduced in which platform and
again if I come
back today and see I again had to search each SoC datasheet. So I think this
patch now clearly explains what new support introduced in which
version of IP and which
SoC platform.

Thanks
Padma