[Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:09:29PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:

> Unless I totally misunderstood, the thread is talking about letting
> established bindings change with each new kernel version.  I am
> opposed to that.

No, nobody is really saying that is a particularly good idea.  There is
some debate about how we work out what an established binding is but
there's no serious suggestion that we don't want stable bindings.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130726/b4884404/attachment.sig>