How to create IRQ mappings in a GPIO driver that doesn't control its IRQ domain ?

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 03:22:29PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Thursday 25 July 2013 14:15:56 Mark Brown wrote:

> > Are the interrupts in a contiguous block in the controller so you can just
> > pass around the controller and a base number?

> In two of the three SoCs I need to fix they are. I've just realized that in 
> the last one the interrupts are in two contiguous blocks in two different 
> parents. I will thus need at least a list of <parent-phandle base count>. Our 
> standard interrupt bindings don't seem to support multiple parents, is that 
> something that we want to fix or should I go for custom bindings ?

It seems reasonable to define the bindings in a generic way in case
other people have the same problem but it's possible I may be missing a
trick regarding how to do this in DT so don't take my word for it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130725/1c948990/attachment.sig>