[PATCH 2/4] ARM: traps: use <asm/opcodes.h> to get correct instruction order
Ben Dooks
ben.dooks at codethink.co.uk
Thu Jul 25 07:17:59 EDT 2013
On 24/07/13 18:34, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:33:51PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
>> The trap handler needs to take into account the endian configuration of
>> the system when loading instructions. Use<asm/opcodes.h> to provide the
>> necessary conversion functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks<ben.dooks at codethink.co.uk>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
>> index 1c08911..0a56e13 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>> #include<asm/unwind.h>
>> #include<asm/tls.h>
>> #include<asm/system_misc.h>
>> +#include<asm/opcodes.h>
>>
>> #include "signal.h"
>
> Looks like is_valid_bugaddr() might need fixing too?
>
> That will need __mem_to_opcode_thumb16() or __mem_to_opcode_arm()
> depending on CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL.
I was looking at that, and was considering if this is the right
thing to do or to change the value of BUG_INSTR_VALUE depending
on this.
It is possible the linker may try and change the ordering of the
BUG() instruction as it is being placed in the output with either
a .hword or .word value. I will go and check this as soon as possible.
>> @@ -411,23 +412,24 @@ asmlinkage void __exception do_undefinstr(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> if (processor_mode(regs) == SVC_MODE) {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL
>> if (thumb_mode(regs)) {
>> - instr = ((u16 *)pc)[0];
>> + instr = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(((u16 *)pc)[0]);
>> if (is_wide_instruction(instr)) {
>> instr<<= 16;
>> - instr |= ((u16 *)pc)[1];
>> + instr |= __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(((u16 *)pc)[1]);
>
> Could use __opcode_thumb32_compose(), in which case it might look like
>
> if (is_wide_instruction(instr)) {
> unsigned int instr2 = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(
> ((u16 *)pc)[1]);
> instr = __opcode_thumb32_compose(instr, instr2);
>
> (Hmmm, I just noticed that is_wide_instruction and __opcode_is_thumb16()
> kinda duplicate each other. Could change that too, but it would look
> more like pointless churn... is_wide_instruction() is used in a fair
> few places already.)
It is possible that it could be changed, but I will avoid that for this
particular patch
>> }
>> } else
>> #endif
>> - instr = *(u32 *) pc;
>> + instr = __mem_to_opcode_arm(*(u32 *) pc);
>> } else if (thumb_mode(regs)) {
>> if (get_user(instr, (u16 __user *)pc))
>> goto die_sig;
>> + instr = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(instr);
>> if (is_wide_instruction(instr)) {
>> unsigned int instr2;
>> if (get_user(instr2, (u16 __user *)pc+1))
>> goto die_sig;
>> instr<<= 16;
>> - instr |= instr2;
>> + instr |= __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(instr2);
>> }
>> } else if (get_user(instr, (u32 __user *)pc)) {
>
> This also needs mem-to-opcode'ing.
Thanks, will check.
--
Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list