[PATCH 3/4] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Move exynos4_idle_driver declaration below in the code
Tomasz Figa
tomasz.figa at gmail.com
Wed Jul 24 04:34:36 EDT 2013
On Thursday 18 of July 2013 14:54:29 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> In order to prevent a pointless forward declaration, move the driver
> declation after the idle function callback, right before the init
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano at linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c | 40
> ++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 18
> insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c index d8fc1a2..8d06128 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
> @@ -37,28 +37,6 @@
>
> #define S5P_CHECK_AFTR 0xFCBA0D10
>
> -static int exynos4_enter_lowpower(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> - struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> - int index);
> -
> -static struct cpuidle_driver exynos4_idle_driver = {
> - .name = "exynos4_idle",
> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> - .states = {
> - [0] = ARM_CPUIDLE_WFI_STATE,
> - [1] = {
> - .enter = exynos4_enter_lowpower,
> - .exit_latency = 300,
> - .target_residency = 100000,
> - .flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,
> - .name = "C1",
> - .desc = "ARM power down",
> - },
> - },
> - .state_count = 2,
> - .safe_state_index = 0,
> -};
> -
> /* Ext-GIC nIRQ/nFIQ is the only wakeup source in AFTR */
> static void exynos4_set_wakeupmask(void)
> {
> @@ -184,6 +162,24 @@ static void __init exynos5_core_down_clk(void)
> __raw_writel(tmp, EXYNOS5_PWR_CTRL2);
> }
>
> +static struct cpuidle_driver exynos4_idle_driver = {
> + .name = "exynos4_idle",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .states = {
> + [0] = ARM_CPUIDLE_WFI_STATE,
> + [1] = {
> + .enter = exynos4_enter_lowpower,
> + .exit_latency = 300,
> + .target_residency = 100000,
> + .flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,
> + .name = "C1",
> + .desc = "ARM power down",
> + },
> + },
> + .state_count = 2,
> + .safe_state_index = 0,
> +};
> +
> static int __init exynos4_init_cpuidle(void)
> {
> if (soc_is_exynos5250())
Makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa at samsung.com>
Best regards,
Tomasz
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list