[PATCH] dma: edma: add device_slave_caps() support

[Fernandes, Joel]

On Jul 24, 2013, at 3:23 AM, "Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars at metafoo.de> wrote:

> On 07/24/2013 10:11 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> On 07/24/2013 03:03 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>> On 07/23/2013 06:43 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>>> Implement device_slave_caps(). EDMA has a limited number of slots.
>>>> Slave drivers such as omap_hsmmc will query the driver to make
>>>> sure they don't pass in more than these many scatter segments.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelf at ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Vinod, or Dan- If this patch looks ok, can you please merge in for
>>>> -rc cycle? This patch is required to fix MMC support on AM33xx. This
>>>> patch is blocking 3 other patches which fix various MMC things. Thanks!
>>>> 
>>>> Notes:
>>>> (1) this approach is temporary and only for -rc cycle to fix MMC on
>>>> AM335x. It will be replace by the RFC series in future kernels:
>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg260094.html
>>>> 
>>>> (2) Patch depends Vinod's patch at:
>>>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1525112
>>>> 
>>>> drivers/dma/edma.c |    9 +++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/edma.c b/drivers/dma/edma.c
>>>> index 7222cbe..81d5429 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/dma/edma.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/edma.c
>>>> @@ -517,6 +517,14 @@ static void edma_issue_pending(struct dma_chan *chan)
>>>>    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&echan->vchan.lock, flags);
>>>> }
>>>> 
>>>> +static inline int edma_slave_caps(struct dma_chan *chan,
>>>> +    struct dma_slave_caps *caps)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    caps->max_sg_nr = MAX_NR_SG;
>>> 
>>> Hm, what about the other fields?
>> 
>> Other fields are unused, the max segment size is supposed to be
>> calculated "given" the address width and burst size. Since these
>> can't be provided to get_caps, I have left it out for now.
>> See: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/6/464
> 
> The PL330 driver is similar in this regard, the maximum segment size also
> depends on address width and burst width. What I did for the get_slave_caps
> implementation is to set it to the minimum maximum size. E.g. in you case
> that should be SZ_64K - 1 (burstsize and addrwidth both set to 1).

So you're setting max to minimum maximum size? Isn't that like telling the driver that its segments can't be bigger than this... Unless I'm missing something..

> 
>> 
>> Even if it did, the "segment size" itself is unused in the MMC driver
>> that this is supposed to fix, unlike the "number of segments" which I'm
>> populating above.
> 
> E.g. for ALSA we'll need to know the max segment size, so I think it doesn't
> hurt add this in this patch as well.

For alsa it would dma only the minimum max size even if the dma controller could do more?

> 
> And you should also initialize all the other fields, even though if there
> are no users yet. It will be really painful to write generic drivers using
> the dmaengine API if none of the dmaengine drivers actually initializes the
> caps struct properly.

Ok sure.

Thanks,

-Joel

> 
> - Lars