[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

Vikas Sajjan sajjan.linux at gmail.com
Mon Jul 22 02:15:27 EDT 2013


Hi Kukjin / Mike,

Can you apply this series

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Yadwinder Singh Brar
<yadi.brar01 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kukjin / Mike,
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com> wrote:
>> Mike Turquette wrote:
>>>
>>> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-06-24 08:02:39)
>>> > On 06/22/13 01:31, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette at linaro.org>
>>> > >
>>> > > Or I can take this through the clk tree. Either way is fine.
>>> > >
>>> > Mike, please go ahead taking this series into the clk tree for 3.11.
>>>
>>> Actually it might be better for you to take it. Patch #5 relies on
>>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c which only exists in the samsung
>>> tree.  It was introduced by commit 1609027f, "clk: exynos5420: register
>>> clocks using common clock framework".
>>>
>> Yes, you're right. It depends on soc-exynos5420 stuff in samsung tree.
>>
>>> And these patches need to be applied with some fuzz to the clk tree due
>>> to other changes which are not in my tree and only present in yours.
>>>
>>> The best two options are either for you to take this series or it can be
>>> rebased on top of clk-next, after which I'll apply it.
>>>
>> Let me try to send this series via samsung tree for v3.11 but I'm not sure because it's a little bit late for arm-soc tree.
>>
>> Thanks for your ack, just note I will send to arm-soc tonight in my time.
>>
>
> Can we get this series merge now in any of trees.
> Please let me if its required to rebase it.
>
> Regards,
> Yadwinder



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list