[RFC PATCH v5 0/1] drivers: mfd: Versatile Express SPC support
Samuel Ortiz
sameo at linux.intel.com
Wed Jul 17 18:47:29 EDT 2013
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 06:22:46PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:29:02PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > At this point I don't really care about the name. I just want the damn
> > > thing merged upstream. But after several iterations to either fit one
> > > or another maintainers taste, each rework ends up in that maintainer
> > > saying: "Now that you've reworked the code, I still don't like it since
> > > this no longer fits in my subsystem tree."
> > FWIW, we asked Pawel to rework the sysreg and config parts of the
> > vexpress driver, make it an actual MFD driver, and spread the remaining
> > bits of the code into their respective subsystems. I don't think
> > this is an eccentric requirement.
>
> I agree. However the code that Lorenzo just posted can't be deprived
> of any more sysreg/config parts.
Yes, and I appreciate Lorenzo's effort here.
> Even the larger code you reviewed before is completely useless without
> _additional_ drivers to go on top which are indeed waiting after this
> code to be merged before they are submitted to their respective
> subsystems.
Right. And merging this code in the right place is exactly what we're
doing here.
> And those additional drivers are way more interesting than this dumb
> register access arbitrator.
Yes, they're a lot smarter hence the requirement to have them live into
their respective subsystems where the right maintainer can provide
relevant reviews on them.
> > I don't mind merging Lorenzo's SPC driver as it is if he can explain to
> > me how it will eventually evolve into an actual MFD driver. If that's
> > not the case, I don't see how I could justify merging it through the
> > MFD tree.
>
> Maybe the misunderstanding is about what actually is a MFD driver.
That's possible. I agree it should be documented properly.
> So I'll follow existing precedents in the kernel and move Lorenzo's code
> to drivers/platform/vexpress/.
Thanks for that.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list