[PATCH 2/2] pwm: Add PWM polarity flag macros for DT

[Thierry Reding]

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:11:19AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/17/2013 05:00 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 15 July 2013 21:39:31 Stephen Warren wrote:
> ...
> >> But then there's a problem where people assume that the common flags are
> >> always available, and somewhere they aren't... Care is needed in the
> >> choice of which common flags to define and/or how they're used.
> > 
> > Exactly. That's why I think listing the supported common flags in individual 
> > bindings makes sense when some of the flags are not supported by all devices. 
> > As the only PWM flags currently used are common to all PWM devices I can leave 
> > this out now. I have no strong preference, I'll follow your opinion on this.
> 
> Yes, I guess separating the concept of defining common flags and which
> devices use them is good. And then indeed individual devices need to
> define which of the common flags they support. I'd still like to see the
> *definition* of those common flags in some central place (i.e. pwm.txt
> or a header that defines constants for it), and the other device
> bindings simply reference that for the actual definitions.

That sounds reasonable to me.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130717/18cb3b2b/attachment.sig>