[PATCH] Route kbd LEDs through the generic LEDs layer

[David Herrmann]

Hi

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Samuel Thibault
<samuel.thibault at ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> David Herrmann, le Mon 15 Jul 2013 17:03:08 +0200, a écrit :
>> > @@ -13,6 +13,10 @@
>> >         bool "Virtual terminal" if EXPERT
>> >         depends on !S390 && !UML
>> >         select INPUT
>> > +       select NEW_LEDS
>> > +       select LEDS_CLASS
>> > +       select LEDS_TRIGGERS
>> > +       select INPUT_LEDS
>>
>> This looks odd. Any dependency changes in the input-layer will break
>> this. But I guess that's what we get for a non-recursive "select". Hmm
>
> Yes, that's the issue.
>
>> I also think that the macros don't really simplify this. So:
>>   [VC_SHIFTLOCK] = { .name = "shiftlock", .activate =
>> kbd_lockstate_trigger_activate },
>> isn't much longer than:
>>   DEFINE_LOCKSTATE_TRIGGER(VC_SHIFTLOCK,  "shiftlock"),
>
> That makes it more than 80 columns, at least.

Indeed, I missed that.

>> > +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ledtrig_ledstate); i++)
>> > +               led_trigger_register(&ledtrig_ledstate[i]);
>> > +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ledtrig_lockstate); i++)
>> > +               led_trigger_register(&ledtrig_lockstate[i]);
>> > +
>>
>> This returns "int", are you sure no error-handling is needed?
>
> ATM only registering the same name several times can happen, and
> shouldn't ever happen. But better warn than be sorry, indeed.

Yepp, it also avoids ignoring any future errors that we might
introduce in led_trigger_register().

>> > + * Keyboard LEDs are propagated by default like the following example:
>> > + *
>> > + * VT keyboard numlock trigger
>> > + * -> vt::numl VT LED
>> > + * -> vt-numl VT trigger
>>
>> Nitpick: What's the reason for the syntax difference? "vt-numl" vs. "vt::numl"
>
> vt::numl is a clear LED classification convention. For triggers, I don't
> see a clear convention, but at least I have never seen "::", only "-".
> That makes me realize that for keyboard triggers I haven't introduced a
> prefix, and only used "scrollock", "numlock", etc. Perhaps
> "kbd-scrollock" etc. or (in phase with LEDs), "kbd::scrollock" etc.?

I understand. Due to lack of insight, I cannot really comment on that,
sorry. Just wanted to go sure you're aware of that. So feel free to
pick any of them.

Thanks
David