[PATCH V2] arm64: KVM: Support X-Gene guest VCPU on APM X-Gene host
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Tue Jul 16 05:14:17 EDT 2013
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 07:55:34AM +0100, Anup Patel wrote:
> This patch allows us to have X-Gene guest VCPU when using KVM arm64
> on APM X-Gene host.
>
> We add KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA for X-Gene Potenza compatible
> guest VCPU and we return KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA in kvm_target_cpu()
> when running on X-Gene host with Potenza core.
>
> V2:
> - Renamed KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_V8 to KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA
>
> V1:
> - Initial patch with target named as KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_V8
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar at linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 5031f42..d9f026b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -55,8 +55,9 @@ struct kvm_regs {
> #define KVM_ARM_TARGET_AEM_V8 0
> #define KVM_ARM_TARGET_FOUNDATION_V8 1
> #define KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A57 2
> +#define KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA 3
>
> -#define KVM_ARM_NUM_TARGETS 3
> +#define KVM_ARM_NUM_TARGETS 4
>
> /* KVM_ARM_SET_DEVICE_ADDR ioctl id encoding */
> #define KVM_ARM_DEVICE_TYPE_SHIFT 0
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> index 2c3ff67..a466244 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -207,19 +207,29 @@ int __attribute_const__ kvm_target_cpu(void)
> unsigned long implementor = read_cpuid_implementor();
> unsigned long part_number = read_cpuid_part_number();
>
> - if (implementor != ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - switch (part_number) {
> - case ARM_CPU_PART_AEM_V8:
> - return KVM_ARM_TARGET_AEM_V8;
> - case ARM_CPU_PART_FOUNDATION:
> - return KVM_ARM_TARGET_FOUNDATION_V8;
> - case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A57:
> - /* Currently handled by the generic backend */
> - return KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A57;
> + switch (implementor) {
> + case ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM:
> + switch (part_number) {
> + case ARM_CPU_PART_AEM_V8:
> + return KVM_ARM_TARGET_AEM_V8;
> + case ARM_CPU_PART_FOUNDATION:
> + return KVM_ARM_TARGET_FOUNDATION_V8;
> + case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A57:
> + return KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A57;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + break;
> + case ARM_CPU_IMP_APM:
> + switch (part_number) {
> + case APM_CPU_PART_POTENZA:
> + return KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + break;
> default:
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
Why not place a return -EINVAL here, outside of the outer switch
statement? That way you don't need to duplicate it for an unknown
implementor or a known implementor's unknown CPU, as long as you keep
the break at the end of each implementor's case.
Thanks,
Mark.
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
> index 4268ab9..8fe6f76 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ static int __init sys_reg_genericv8_init(void)
> &genericv8_target_table);
> kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A57,
> &genericv8_target_table);
> + kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA,
> + &genericv8_target_table);
> +
> return 0;
> }
> late_initcall(sys_reg_genericv8_init);
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list