[RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling
Tony Lindgren
tony at atomide.com
Thu Jul 11 02:17:58 EDT 2013
* Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org> [130710 13:42]:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Grygorii Strashko
> <grygorii.strashko at ti.com> wrote:
>
> > I think, In the future the OMAP pinctrl configurations would be manged in
> > more flexible way then now (thanks to "pinctrl PM helpers" and you;))
> > - "Idle" state will be splitted to "Idle"/"sleep"
> > - "default" state will be splitted to "default"/"active"
>
> OK so the first ones we already have so the discussion is now down
> to adding the "active" state (and pinctrl_pm* helper function).
I think I have a patchset ready for pinctrl to allow multiple simulaneous
states as discussed, need to test it first though. Should be able to
post it on Friday hopefully.
> I guess we need a patch set prepared which adds the "active" state
> and helper function as the first patch, i.e. this:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137094012703340&w=2
> Can I have your ACK on this patch?
Hmm I have gone a bit further with the drivers/base/pinctrl.c in my
set where if active state is defined then sleep and idle states must
match active state for the pingroups to avoid constantly checking
those sets during runtime.
Then the pinctrl_pm_select_active_state() does not actually have
anything to do with PM in the rx/tx case, so we should rename that.
It's pretty close, but before we can apply that we need the changes
I have to allow multiple simultaneous states. I suggest wait just
few days on that patch.
> I do not want to add the state unless there is a clear consumer,
> so it needs to go in with the first patch to a device driver that uses
> pinctrl_pm_select_active_state() which will be a good demonstration
> on its use and utility. (And a point to object and suggest other ways
> to do the same thing...)
Right, we have quite a few consumers with omaps for that as am33xx
requires remuxing wake-up events for all drivers AFAIK. The MMC SDIO
pin remuxing is probably closest one ready.
Regards,
Tony
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list