[RFC 0/4] Cleanup PRM and CM regbit headers
rnayak at ti.com
Fri Jul 5 01:43:04 EDT 2013
On Thursday 04 July 2013 10:14 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> You mentioned that these patches were generated with some kind of awk/grep
> scripting. Can you integrate that in an automated way into the
> autogeneration flow? If the answer is yes, then keep the header. If the
> answer is no, then the header should be dropped. Benoît, maybe you have
> an opinion too?
Ok, I'll try and integrate those scripts so all this can be done in an
automated way even for newer SoCs.
> As far as whether this should go in -rcX or not, my view is that, as a
> matter of policy, large changes like this should wait until v3.12. Now,
> having written that, I also was under the impression that the OMAP5
> changes weren't going to be sent upstream unless the total diffstat would
> be balanced to roughly zero or negative lines. As far as I know, that
> didn't happen. So I guess, v3.11-rc it is... kernel development by
> diffstat :-(
I don't mind these going in -rcX or 3.12, either way is fine.
> Finally, please repost the whole series once you're done with your
> changes, as a non-RFC, along with your pull request (if you plan to send
> one). I guess I should be the one to take these, since I wound up taking
> the OMAP5 addition...
:) I thought so too that you should be the one sending the pull.
I will post these out as non-RFC after I do a clean integration into
the autogen scripts, and then you can take a call on sending the pull for
either -rcX or 3.12
More information about the linux-arm-kernel