[PATCH V3 3/3] video: exynos_dp: Use the generic PHY driver
Jingoo Han
jg1.han at samsung.com
Tue Jul 2 03:05:49 EDT 2013
On Tuesday, July 02, 2013 4:36 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>
> Hi Jingoo,
>
> On 07/01/2013 07:24 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > Use the generic PHY API instead of the platform callback to control
> > the DP PHY. The 'phy_label' field is added to the platform data
> > structure to allow PHY lookup on non-dt platforms.
>
> Since Exynos is currently a dt-only platform upstream, how about
> first making a pre-requisite patch that would remove support for
> non-dt platforms from this driver ? I think you could now move the
> content of file include/video/exynos_dp.h to e.g. drivers/video/
> exynos/exynos_dp_core.h and remove the public exynos_dp.h file.
> pdata->phy_init/exit could also be dropped and you wouldn't need
> to care about non-dt support with the generic PHY API.
Yes, you're right.
I will make the pre-requisite patch that would remove support for
non-dt platforms from exynos_dp_core.c.
Then, I will move the content of file include/video/exynos_dp.h
and remove 'exynos_dp.h' file.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han<jg1.han at samsung.com>
> > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi<balbi at ti.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/video/exynos_dp.txt | 23 +---
> > drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 118 ++------------------
> > drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h | 2 +
> > include/video/exynos_dp.h | 6 +-
> > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/exynos_dp.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/exynos_dp.txt
> > index 84f10c1..71645dc 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/exynos_dp.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/exynos_dp.txt
> > @@ -1,17 +1,6 @@
> > The Exynos display port interface should be configured based on
> > the type of panel connected to it.
> >
> > -We use two nodes:
> > - -dp-controller node
> > - -dptx-phy node(defined inside dp-controller node)
> > -
> > -For the DP-PHY initialization, we use the dptx-phy node.
> > -Required properties for dptx-phy:
> > - -reg:
> > - Base address of DP PHY register.
> > - -samsung,enable-mask:
> > - The bit-mask used to enable/disable DP PHY.
> > -
> > For the Panel initialization, we read data from dp-controller node.
> > Required properties for dp-controller:
> > -compatible:
> > @@ -25,6 +14,10 @@ Required properties for dp-controller:
> > from common clock binding: handle to dp clock.
> > -clock-names:
> > from common clock binding: Shall be "dp".
> > + -phys:
> > + from general phy binding: the phandle for the PHY device.
> > + -phy-names:
> > + from general phy binding: Should be "dp".
> > -interrupt-parent:
> > phandle to Interrupt combiner node.
> > -samsung,color-space:
> > @@ -67,12 +60,8 @@ SOC specific portion:
> > interrupt-parent =<&combiner>;
> > clocks =<&clock 342>;
> > clock-names = "dp";
> > -
> > - dptx-phy {
> > - reg =<0x10040720>;
> > - samsung,enable-mask =<1>;
> > - };
> > -
> > + phys =<&dp_phy>;
> > + phy-names = "dp";
> > };
> >
> > Board Specific portion:
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> > index 12bbede..bac515b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> > #include<linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include<linux/delay.h>
> > #include<linux/of.h>
> > +#include<linux/phy/phy.h>
> >
> > #include<video/exynos_dp.h>
> >
> > @@ -960,84 +961,15 @@ static struct exynos_dp_platdata *exynos_dp_dt_parse_pdata(struct device *dev)
> > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > }
> >
> > - return pd;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
> > -{
> > - struct device_node *dp_phy_node = of_node_get(dp->dev->of_node);
> > - u32 phy_base;
> > - int ret = 0;
> > -
> > - dp_phy_node = of_find_node_by_name(dp_phy_node, "dptx-phy");
> > - if (!dp_phy_node) {
> > - dev_err(dp->dev, "could not find dptx-phy node\n");
> > - return -ENODEV;
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "reg",&phy_base)) {
> > - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get reg for dptx-phy\n");
> > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > - goto err;
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "samsung,enable-mask",
> > - &dp->enable_mask)) {
> > - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get enable-mask for dptx-phy\n");
> > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > - goto err;
> > - }
> > -
> > - dp->phy_addr = ioremap(phy_base, SZ_4);
> > - if (!dp->phy_addr) {
> > - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to ioremap dp-phy\n");
> > - ret = -ENOMEM;
> > - goto err;
> > - }
> > -
> > -err:
> > - of_node_put(dp_phy_node);
> > -
> > - return ret;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void exynos_dp_phy_init(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
> > -{
> > - u32 reg;
> > -
> > - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr);
> > - reg |= dp->enable_mask;
> > - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void exynos_dp_phy_exit(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
> > -{
> > - u32 reg;
> > + pd->phy_label = "dp";
> >
> > - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr);
> > - reg&= ~(dp->enable_mask);
> > - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr);
> > + return pd;
> > }
>
> I'm afraid you cannot simply remove the above code, the original binding
> still needs to be supported. As far as I can see Arndale and smdk5250 are
> already users of that binding in mainline now.
>
> Thus the benefits of adding the generic PHY support to this Display Port
> controller driver are starting to be a bit questionable.
OK.
I will keep supporting this original DT binding.
>
> > #else
> > static struct exynos_dp_platdata *exynos_dp_dt_parse_pdata(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > return NULL;
> > }
> > -
> > -static int exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
> > -{
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void exynos_dp_phy_init(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
> > -{
> > - return;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void exynos_dp_phy_exit(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
> > -{
> > - return;
> > -}
> > #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
>
> I think you could make the driver dependent on CONFIG_OF now and
> related #ifdefs and !CONFIG_OF function stubs could be removed.
OK.
I will add 'depends on OF', then remove '#ifdef CONFIG_OF'
as well as !CONFIG_OF function stubs.
>
> > static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > @@ -1061,10 +993,6 @@ static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > pdata = exynos_dp_dt_parse_pdata(&pdev->dev);
> > if (IS_ERR(pdata))
> > return PTR_ERR(pdata);
> > -
> > - ret = exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata(dp);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > } else {
> > pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> > if (!pdata) {
> > @@ -1073,6 +1001,10 @@ static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + dp->phy = devm_phy_get(&pdev->dev, pdata->phy_label);
> > + if (IS_ERR(dp->phy))
> > + return PTR_ERR(dp->phy);
> > +
> > dp->clock = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "dp");
> > if (IS_ERR(dp->clock)) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get clock\n");
> > @@ -1097,13 +1029,7 @@ static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > dp->video_info = pdata->video_info;
> >
> > - if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
> > - if (dp->phy_addr)
> > - exynos_dp_phy_init(dp);
> > - } else {
> > - if (pdata->phy_init)
> > - pdata->phy_init();
> > - }
> > + phy_power_on(dp->phy);
> >
> > exynos_dp_init_dp(dp);
> >
> > @@ -1121,42 +1047,27 @@ static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > static int exynos_dp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > - struct exynos_dp_platdata *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> > struct exynos_dp_device *dp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >
> > flush_work(&dp->hotplug_work);
> >
> > - if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
> > - if (dp->phy_addr)
> > - exynos_dp_phy_exit(dp);
> > - } else {
> > - if (pdata->phy_exit)
> > - pdata->phy_exit();
> > - }
> > + phy_power_off(dp->phy);
> >
> > clk_disable_unprepare(dp->clock);
> >
> > -
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > static int exynos_dp_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > - struct exynos_dp_platdata *pdata = dev->platform_data;
> > struct exynos_dp_device *dp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >
> > disable_irq(dp->irq);
> >
> > flush_work(&dp->hotplug_work);
> >
> > - if (dev->of_node) {
> > - if (dp->phy_addr)
> > - exynos_dp_phy_exit(dp);
> > - } else {
> > - if (pdata->phy_exit)
> > - pdata->phy_exit();
> > - }
> > + phy_power_off(dp->phy);
> >
> > clk_disable_unprepare(dp->clock);
> >
> > @@ -1165,16 +1076,9 @@ static int exynos_dp_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >
> > static int exynos_dp_resume(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > - struct exynos_dp_platdata *pdata = dev->platform_data;
> > struct exynos_dp_device *dp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >
> > - if (dev->of_node) {
> > - if (dp->phy_addr)
> > - exynos_dp_phy_init(dp);
> > - } else {
> > - if (pdata->phy_init)
> > - pdata->phy_init();
> > - }
> > + phy_power_on(dp->phy);
> >
> > clk_prepare_enable(dp->clock);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h b/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h
> > index 6c567bbf..b3d0328 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h
> > +++ b/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h
> > @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ struct exynos_dp_device {
> > struct video_info *video_info;
> > struct link_train link_train;
> > struct work_struct hotplug_work;
> > +
> > + struct phy *phy;
> > };
> >
> > /* exynos_dp_reg.c */
> > diff --git a/include/video/exynos_dp.h b/include/video/exynos_dp.h
> > index bd8cabd..f38c9af 100644
> > --- a/include/video/exynos_dp.h
> > +++ b/include/video/exynos_dp.h
> > @@ -122,10 +122,8 @@ struct video_info {
> > };
> >
> > struct exynos_dp_platdata {
>
> Since Exynos doesn't support non-dt boot now this platform data structure
> is not used, is it ?
You're right.
It can be removed, if Exynos DP driver does not non-DT.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
>
> > - struct video_info *video_info;
> > -
> > - void (*phy_init)(void);
> > - void (*phy_exit)(void);
> > + struct video_info *video_info;
> > + const char *phy_label;
> > };
> >
> > #endif /* _EXYNOS_DP_H */
>
> Regards,
> Sylwester
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list