[GIT PULL v2] Renesas ARM-based SoC for v3.9

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:18:02AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:11:38AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:55:18PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > Hi Olof, Hi Arnd,
> > > 
> > > please consider the following soc enhancements for 3.9.
> > > 
> > > This series is based on a merge of the irqchip/gic-vic-move and
> > > timer/cleanup branches in the arm-soc tree. There were a number of
> > > conflicts in this merge, as indicated by the merge commit
> > > 6265b0f325eed54558b35769aecb1d79423295c7. In each case I took care to
> > > match the merge made in the arm-soc tree which is evident in the for-next
> > > branch.
> > > 
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > The following changes since commit 6265b0f325eed54558b35769aecb1d79423295c7:
> > > 
> > >   Merge remote-tracking branches 'arm-soc/irqchip/gic-vic-move' and 'arm-soc/timer/cleanup' into soc (2013-01-24 17:57:20 +0900)
> > > 
> > > are available in the git repository at:
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/renesas.git soc
> > > 
> > 
> > Merged, thanks. You had resolved the board_bcm conflict slightly differenlty
> > (technically better), but to keep it common with what we have, I added back
> > the extra line of whitespace.
> > 
> > By the way, you should look into starting to use signed tags for your pull
> > requests, since it gives you a place to give a short description of the branch
> > (and that description makes it into the commit with 0 work on our behalf :)
> 
> Sure, will do.

I have attempted to do so for two pull requests I sent a little earlier
today. Please let me know if I have missed something.