[PATCH v2] mm: dmapool: use provided gfp flags for all dma_alloc_coherent() calls
Soeren Moch
smoch at web.de
Tue Jan 29 06:50:04 EST 2013
On 29.01.2013 12:02, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Now I activated the debug messages in em28xx. From the messages I
>> see no correlation of the pool exhaustion and lost sync. Also I
>> cannot see any error messages from the em28xx driver.
>> I see a lot of init_isoc/stop_urbs (maybe EPG scan?) without
>> draining the coherent pool (checked with 'cat
>> /debug/dma-api/num_free_entries', which gave stable numbers), but
>> after half an hour there are only init_isoc messages without
>> corresponding stop_urbs messages and num_free_entries decreased
>> until coherent pool exhaustion.
>
> Hi Soeren
>
> em28xx_stop_urbs() is only called by em28xx_stop_streaming().
>
> em28xx_stop_streaming() is only called by em28xx_stop_feed()
> when 0 == dvb->nfeeds.
>
> em28xx_stop_feed()and em28xx_start_feed() look O.K, dvb->nfeeds is
> protected by a mutex etc.
>
> Now, em28xx_init_isoc() is also called by buffer_prepare(). This uses
> em28xx_alloc_isoc() to do the actual allocation, and that function
> sets up the urb such that on completion the function
> em28xx_irq_callback() is called.
>
> It looks like there might be issues here:
>
> Once the data has been copied out, it resubmits the urb:
>
> urb->status = usb_submit_urb(urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (urb->status) {
> em28xx_isocdbg("urb resubmit failed (error=%i)\n",
> urb->status);
> }
>
> However, if the ubs_submit_urb fails, it looks like the urb is lost.
>
> If you look at other code submitting urbs you have this pattern:
>
> rc = usb_submit_urb(isoc_bufs->urb[i], GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (rc) {
> em28xx_err("submit of urb %i failed (error=%i)\n", i,
> rc);
> em28xx_uninit_isoc(dev, mode);
> return rc;
> }
>
> Do you have your build such that you would see "urb resubmit failed"
> in your logs? Are there any?
I only had "urb resubmit failed" messages _after_ the coherent pool
exhaustion. So I guess something below the usb_submit_urb call is
allocating (too much) memory, sometimes. Or can dvb_demux allocate
memory and blame orion-ehci for it?
Soeren
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list