[GIT PULL][for 3.8] request from armsoc/fix branch in pxa git tree

Olof Johansson olof at lixom.net
Mon Jan 28 01:35:29 EST 2013


On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:37:29PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Haojian Zhuang
> > <haojian.zhuang at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Arnd & Olof,
> >>
> >> Please help to pull armsoc/fix branch in pxa git tree.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Haojian
> >>
> >> The following changes since commit 7d1f9aeff1ee4a20b1aeb377dd0f579fe9647619:
> >>
> >>   Linux 3.8-rc4 (2013-01-17 19:25:45 -0800)
> >>
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >>
> >>   git://github.com/hzhuang1/linux.git armsoc/fix
> >>
> >> for you to fetch changes up to eea6e39b916dd282c7fa4629be8934b5ad60e62b:
> >>
> >>   ARM: pxa: Minor naming fixes in spitz.c (2013-01-23 17:13:07 +0800)
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Igor Grinberg (1):
> >>       ARM: PXA3xx: program the CSMSADRCFG register
> >>
> >> Marko Katic (1):
> >>       ARM: pxa: Minor naming fixes in spitz.c
> >>
> >> Mike Dunn (2):
> >>       ARM: palmtreo: fix lcd initilialization on treo680
> >>       ARM: palmtreo: fix #ifdefs for leds-gpio device
> >
> > I don't think some of those really are regressions, are they? I.e. the
> > palmtreo fixes are for code that never in recent times worked I think?
> >
> > If so, I'd prefer to queue this for 3.9 as a fixes-non-critical
> > instead, please let me know if that's ok.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Olof
> 
> It's fine to me. You can queue all of them into 3.9 release cycle.

Great, merged into next/fixes-non-critical. Thanks!


-Olof



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list