One of these things (CONFIG_HZ) is not like the others..
arnd at arndb.de
Tue Jan 22 03:27:54 EST 2013
On Monday 21 January 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> In this particular case, EBSA110 is not a candidate for multi-arch
> build anyway, because it's ARMv4 and we're only really bothering with
> ARMv6 and better.
> Not only that, but the IO stuff on it is sufficiently obscure and
Right, no point worrying about EBSA110. We need to work out OMAP and
Exynos/S5P though: As long as OMAP needs 128HZ and Exynos needs 200HZ,
we can never have them in the same kernel.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel