[PATCH v7 01/15] Revert "pinctrl: single: support gpio request and free"
Tony Lindgren
tony at atomide.com
Mon Jan 21 11:56:41 EST 2013
* Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang at linaro.org> [130117 23:34]:
> This reverts commit 2e8b2eab94c35d83bb7da71c63b4695f32ddca88.
>
> Conflicts:
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
>
> ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.ko]
> undefined!]
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Russell King wrote:
>
> > The above error happens in builds including pinctrl-single - the
> > reason
> > is this, where resource_size_t may be 64-bit.
> >
> > gpio->range.pin_base = (r.start - pcs->res->start) /
> > mux_bytes;
> > gpio->range.npins = (r.end - r.start) / mux_bytes + 1;
>
> The reason of not fixing this issue and reverting the patch instead is
> this patch can't handle another case. It's not easy to handle multiple
> gpios sharing one pin register. So this gpio range feature will be
> implemented by other patches.
Makes sense to me, I don't think we have any users yet for this:
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 79 +-------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> index f6a360b..5c32e88 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@
> #define PCS_MUX_BITS_NAME "pinctrl-single,bits"
> #define PCS_REG_NAME_LEN ((sizeof(unsigned long) * 2) + 1)
> #define PCS_OFF_DISABLED ~0U
> -#define PCS_MAX_GPIO_VALUES 2
>
> /**
> * struct pcs_pingroup - pingroups for a function
> @@ -78,16 +77,6 @@ struct pcs_function {
> };
>
> /**
> - * struct pcs_gpio_range - pinctrl gpio range
> - * @range: subrange of the GPIO number space
> - * @gpio_func: gpio function value in the pinmux register
> - */
> -struct pcs_gpio_range {
> - struct pinctrl_gpio_range range;
> - int gpio_func;
> -};
> -
> -/**
> * struct pcs_data - wrapper for data needed by pinctrl framework
> * @pa: pindesc array
> * @cur: index to current element
> @@ -414,26 +403,9 @@ static void pcs_disable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned fselector,
> }
>
> static int pcs_request_gpio(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> - struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range, unsigned pin)
> + struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range, unsigned offset)
> {
> - struct pcs_device *pcs = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> - struct pcs_gpio_range *gpio = NULL;
> - int end, mux_bytes;
> - unsigned data;
> -
> - gpio = container_of(range, struct pcs_gpio_range, range);
> - end = range->pin_base + range->npins - 1;
> - if (pin < range->pin_base || pin > end) {
> - dev_err(pctldev->dev,
> - "pin %d isn't in the range of %d to %d\n",
> - pin, range->pin_base, end);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> - mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE;
> - data = pcs->read(pcs->base + pin * mux_bytes) & ~pcs->fmask;
> - data |= gpio->gpio_func;
> - pcs->write(data, pcs->base + pin * mux_bytes);
> - return 0;
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
>
> static struct pinmux_ops pcs_pinmux_ops = {
> @@ -907,49 +879,6 @@ static void pcs_free_resources(struct pcs_device *pcs)
>
> static struct of_device_id pcs_of_match[];
>
> -static int pcs_add_gpio_range(struct device_node *node, struct pcs_device *pcs)
> -{
> - struct pcs_gpio_range *gpio;
> - struct device_node *child;
> - struct resource r;
> - const char name[] = "pinctrl-single";
> - u32 gpiores[PCS_MAX_GPIO_VALUES];
> - int ret, i = 0, mux_bytes = 0;
> -
> - for_each_child_of_node(node, child) {
> - ret = of_address_to_resource(child, 0, &r);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - continue;
> - memset(gpiores, 0, sizeof(u32) * PCS_MAX_GPIO_VALUES);
> - ret = of_property_read_u32_array(child, "pinctrl-single,gpio",
> - gpiores, PCS_MAX_GPIO_VALUES);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - continue;
> - gpio = devm_kzalloc(pcs->dev, sizeof(*gpio), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!gpio) {
> - dev_err(pcs->dev, "failed to allocate pcs gpio\n");
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> - gpio->range.name = devm_kzalloc(pcs->dev, sizeof(name),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!gpio->range.name) {
> - dev_err(pcs->dev, "failed to allocate range name\n");
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> - memcpy((char *)gpio->range.name, name, sizeof(name));
> -
> - gpio->range.id = i++;
> - gpio->range.base = gpiores[0];
> - gpio->gpio_func = gpiores[1];
> - mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE;
> - gpio->range.pin_base = (r.start - pcs->res->start) / mux_bytes;
> - gpio->range.npins = (r.end - r.start) / mux_bytes + 1;
> -
> - pinctrl_add_gpio_range(pcs->pctl, &gpio->range);
> - }
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int pcs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> @@ -1046,10 +975,6 @@ static int pcs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto free;
> }
>
> - ret = pcs_add_gpio_range(np, pcs);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - goto free;
> -
> dev_info(pcs->dev, "%i pins at pa %p size %u\n",
> pcs->desc.npins, pcs->base, pcs->size);
>
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list