[PATCH v5 7/9] ARM: davinci: Remoteproc platform device creation data/code
Sekhar Nori
nsekhar at ti.com
Mon Jan 21 03:34:17 EST 2013
On 1/11/2013 5:53 AM, Robert Tivy wrote:
> Added a new remoteproc platform device for DA8XX. Contains CMA-based
> reservation of physical memory block. A new kernel command-line
> parameter has been added to allow boot-time specification of the
> physical memory block.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Tivy <rtivy at ti.com>
> ---
> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 7 +++
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h | 4 ++
> 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 363e348..e95afb1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ parameter is applicable:
> AVR32 AVR32 architecture is enabled.
> AX25 Appropriate AX.25 support is enabled.
> BLACKFIN Blackfin architecture is enabled.
> + CMA Contiguous Memory Area support is enabled.
> DRM Direct Rendering Management support is enabled.
> DYNAMIC_DEBUG Build in debug messages and enable them at runtime
> EDD BIOS Enhanced Disk Drive Services (EDD) is enabled
> @@ -2634,6 +2635,12 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
> Useful for devices that are detected asynchronously
> (e.g. USB and MMC devices).
>
> + rproc_mem=nn[KMG][@address]
> + [KNL,ARM,CMA] Remoteproc physical memory block.
> + Memory area to be used by remote processor image,
> + managed by CMA. Suitable defaults exist if not
> + specified.
There are no defaults now, right?
> +
> rw [KNL] Mount root device read-write on boot
>
> S [KNL] Run init in single mode
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
> index fb2f51b..e8016ca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
> @@ -12,10 +12,11 @@
> */
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> -#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-contiguous.h>
> #include <linux/serial_8250.h>
> #include <linux/ahci_platform.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_data/da8xx-remoteproc.h>
>
> #include <mach/cputype.h>
> #include <mach/common.h>
> @@ -706,6 +707,96 @@ int __init da850_register_mmcsd1(struct davinci_mmc_config *config)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static struct resource da8xx_rproc_resources[] = {
> + { /* DSP boot address */
> + .start = DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE + DA8XX_HOST1CFG_REG,
> + .end = DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE + DA8XX_HOST1CFG_REG + 3,
> + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> + },
> + { /* dsp irq */
> + .start = IRQ_DA8XX_CHIPINT0,
> + .end = IRQ_DA8XX_CHIPINT0,
> + .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct da8xx_rproc_pdata rproc_pdata = {
> + .name = "dsp",
> +};
Since the driver is only for da850 so the name of the remote processor
is fixed and can probably be hardcoded in the driver itself.
> +
> +static struct platform_device da8xx_dsp = {
> + .name = "davinci-rproc",
> + .id = 0,
> + .dev = {
> + .platform_data = &rproc_pdata,
> + .coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
> + },
> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_rproc_resources),
> + .resource = da8xx_rproc_resources,
> +};
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DAVINCI_REMOTEPROC)
> +
> +static phys_addr_t rproc_base __initdata;
> +static unsigned long rproc_size __initdata;
> +
> +static int __init early_rproc_mem(char *p)
> +{
> + char *endp;
> +
> + if (p == NULL)
> + return 0;
> +
> + rproc_size = memparse(p, &endp);
> + if (*endp == '@')
> + rproc_base = memparse(endp + 1, NULL);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("rproc_mem", early_rproc_mem);
> +
> +void __init da8xx_rproc_reserve_cma(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!rproc_base || !rproc_size) {
> + pr_err("%s: 'rproc_mem=nn at address' badly specified\n"
> + " 'nn' and 'address' must both be non-zero\n",
> + __func__);
> +
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + pr_info("%s: reserving 0x%lx @ 0x%lx...\n",
> + __func__, rproc_size, (unsigned long)rproc_base);
> +
> + ret = dma_declare_contiguous(&da8xx_dsp.dev, rproc_size, rproc_base, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("%s: dma_declare_contiguous failed %d\n", __func__, ret);
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +
> +void __init da8xx_rproc_reserve_cma(void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> +
> +int __init da8xx_register_rproc(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = platform_device_register(&da8xx_dsp);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("%s: platform_device_register: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +};
> +
> static struct resource da8xx_rtc_resources[] = {
> {
> .start = DA8XX_RTC_BASE,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h
> index 700d311..e9295bd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ extern unsigned int da850_max_speed;
> #define DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE (IO_PHYS + 0x14000)
> #define DA8XX_SYSCFG0_VIRT(x) (da8xx_syscfg0_base + (x))
> #define DA8XX_JTAG_ID_REG 0x18
> +#define DA8XX_HOST1CFG_REG 0x44
> #define DA8XX_CFGCHIP0_REG 0x17c
> #define DA8XX_CFGCHIP2_REG 0x184
> #define DA8XX_CFGCHIP3_REG 0x188
> @@ -105,6 +106,9 @@ int __init da850_register_vpif_display
> int __init da850_register_vpif_capture
> (struct vpif_capture_config *capture_config);
> void da8xx_restart(char mode, const char *cmd);
> +void __init da8xx_rproc_reserve_cma(void);
No need of __init qualifier in function prototypes.
The patch looks good to me otherwise, but I will not apply it right away
and instead wait for the driver to get accepted first.
Thanks,
Sekhar
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list