[PATCH v7 05/15] gpio: fix wrong checking condition for gpio range
Sergei Shtylyov
sshtylyov at mvista.com
Fri Jan 18 07:18:40 EST 2013
Hello.
On 18-01-2013 11:31, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> Since index++ calculates from 0, the checking condition of "while
> (index++)" is always fake. So replace it by unconditional loop.
> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang at linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> index b1f0682..011e1e98 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip)
> if (!np)
> return;
>
> - do {
> + for (;;) {
Why not:
for (;; index++) {
> ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "gpio-ranges",
> "#gpio-range-cells", index, &pinspec);
> if (ret)
> @@ -254,8 +254,8 @@ static void of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip)
>
> if (ret)
> break;
> -
> - } while (index++);
> + index++;
> + }
> }
WBR, Sergei
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list