[[PATCH v2]] OMAP: omap4-panda: add WiLink shared transport power functions
peter.ujfalusi at ti.com
Thu Jan 17 04:55:14 EST 2013
On 01/17/2013 10:34 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> I just wonder how this is going to work with DT... You are not going to have
>> the ability to use callback in this form.
>> I think the GPIO handling should be done in the driver itself rather than in
>> the board file.
> that can (should ?) be moved to ti-st eventually. In fact I don't know
> why it was removed in the first place, we would need Pavan to help us
> with that query.
Yes, this is a good question. I don't know what is the spacial thing platforms
need to do in the callback..
> Still, for -rc, the minimal patch had to be cooked, right ?
Sure it need to be fixed. I would try to revert the patch which caused the
issue (eccf2979 drivers/misc/ti-st: remove gpio handling).
Should fix the legacy boot, but it is going to be even bigger fun to move to
DT (and get rid of the callbacks).
I don't have anything against this patch as such. Just wanted to point out the
obvious that the comfort of callbacks are not going to be around in some cases.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel