[RFC PATCH 0/4] b.L: Memory barriers and miscellaneous tidyups
Dave Martin
dave.martin at linaro.org
Tue Jan 15 11:48:14 EST 2013
After much head-scratching and discussion, I have concluded that we
need comprehensive memory barriers in order to ensure that the
low-level synchronisation code executes robustly on all platforms.
DSBs are excessive on most situations though, so many DSBs can be
replces with DMBs.
As was observed in review, providing a C interface to the vlocks
makes little sense, so this series gets rid of it.
Dave Martin (4):
ARM: b.L: Remove C declarations for vlocks
ARM: b.L: vlocks: Add architecturally required memory barriers
ARM: bL_entry: Match memory barriers to architectural requirements
ARM: vexpress/dcscb: power_up_setup memory barrier cleanup
arch/arm/common/bL_head.S | 40 ++++++++-----------------------
arch/arm/common/vlock.S | 7 ++++-
arch/arm/common/vlock.h | 43 ----------------------------------
arch/arm/mach-vexpress/dcscb_setup.S | 5 +--
4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/arm/common/vlock.h
--
1.7.4.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list